Fixes #21624 Adds the npm package version metadata fields that Gitea's npm registry was previously dropping on publish, and implements the `npm deprecate` command, which Gitea did not accept before. ### New / pass-through metadata fields The following are now parsed from the publish payload, persisted in the stored `npm.Metadata`, and re-emitted on the abbreviated version manifest returned to npm clients: - `hasInstallScript` — auto-detected from `scripts.preinstall` / `scripts.install` / `scripts.postinstall` (also honors a client-supplied value). Without this flag, `npm install` skips lifecycle scripts. - `_hasShrinkwrap` — authoritatively derived by inspecting the uploaded tarball for a top-level `*/npm-shrinkwrap.json` entry. Client-supplied values are ignored. Decompression failures fall back to `false` and do not block publish (integrity has already been validated). - `engines` (`map[string]string`) - `cpu`, `os` (`[]string`) - `directories` (`map[string]string`) - `funding` (`any`; preserves the spec's string / object / array shape) - `acceptDependencies` (`map[string]string`) - `deprecated` (`string`) `peerDependenciesMeta` was already in the stored struct but is now exercised by tests. ### `npm deprecate` support `npm deprecate <pkg-spec> <message>` PUTs the package document to the same URL as publish but with no `_attachments`. The router now detects that shape and routes to a new handler that updates each affected version's stored `Metadata.Deprecated` via `packages_model.UpdateVersion`. An empty message clears the flag (undeprecate). Unknown versions are silently skipped, matching npm's behavior. No new routes were added. Supported invocations include: - `npm deprecate my-thing@"< 0.2.3" "critical bug fixed in v0.2.3"` - `npm deprecate my-thing@1.x "1.x is no longer supported"` - `npm deprecate my-thing@1.0.0 ""` (undeprecate) --------- Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Gitea Package Registry
This document gives a brief overview how the package registry is organized in code.
Structure
The package registry code is divided into multiple modules to split the functionality and make code reuse possible.
| Module | Description |
|---|---|
models/packages |
Common methods and models used by all registry types |
models/packages/<type> |
Methods used by specific registry type. There should be no need to use type specific models. |
modules/packages |
Common methods and types used by multiple registry types |
modules/packages/<type> |
Registry type specific methods and types (e.g. metadata extraction of package files) |
routers/api/packages |
Route definitions for all registry types |
routers/api/packages/<type> |
Route implementation for a specific registry type |
services/packages |
Helper methods used by registry types to handle common tasks like package creation and deletion in routers |
services/packages/<type> |
Registry type specific methods used by routers and services |
Models
Every package registry implementation uses the same underlying models:
| Model | Description |
|---|---|
Package |
The root of a package providing values fixed for every version (e.g. the package name) |
PackageVersion |
A version of a package containing metadata (e.g. the package description) |
PackageFile |
A file of a package describing its content (e.g. file name) |
PackageBlob |
The content of a file (may be shared by multiple files) |
PackageProperty |
Additional properties attached to Package, PackageVersion or PackageFile (e.g. used if metadata is needed for routing) |
The following diagram shows the relationship between the models:
Package <1---*> PackageVersion <1---*> PackageFile <*---1> PackageBlob
Adding a new package registry type
Before adding a new package registry type have a look at the existing implementation to get an impression of how it could work.
Most registry types offer endpoints to retrieve the metadata, upload and download package files.
The upload endpoint is often the heavy part because it must validate the uploaded blob, extract metadata and create the models.
The methods to validate and extract the metadata should be added in the modules/packages/<type> package.
If the upload is valid the methods in services/packages allow to store the upload and create the corresponding models.
It depends if the registry type allows multiple files per package version which method should be called:
CreatePackageAndAddFile: error if package version already existsCreatePackageOrAddFileToExisting: error if file already existsAddFileToExistingPackage: error if package version does not exist or file already exists
services/packages also contains helper methods to download a file or to remove a package version.
There are no helper methods for metadata endpoints because they are very type specific.