Updating a branch by merge produced an unsigned commit even when merges
are configured to be signed. Update by rebase was unaffected.
`Update()` builds a fake reverse PR to switch head and base, and it has
no `Index`, so `pr.GetGitHeadRefName()` resolves `refs/pull/0/head`.
Since #36186 `SignMerge` looks that ref up in the base repository
instead of the temporary merge repo. That lookup fails. The caller
dropped the error, so `sign` stayed false.
Sync fork goes through the same fake-PR path.
Pass both sides of the merge to `SignMerge` as refs and evaluate them in
the temp repo, where `base` and `tracking` always exist.
Tests cover a signed and an unsigned update by merge.
Fixes#38066
Backport #38441
Backport #38476 by @bircni
When an Actions job is blocked or waiting, the job view only shows the
generic **Blocked** / **Waiting** label. Users have no way to tell *why*
a job is stuck — whether it's waiting on dependencies, waiting for a
runner that doesn't exist, waiting for a runner whose labels don't
match, or simply queued behind busy runners.
## Change
The current-job detail line now surfaces the actual cause:
- **Blocked** → lists the dependency jobs (`needs`) that haven't
finished yet, e.g. *"Waiting for the following jobs to complete:
build."*
- **Waiting**, no online runner → *"No runner is online to pick up this
job."*
- **Waiting**, online runners but none match `runs-on` → *"No matching
online runner with label: X"* (reuses the existing string)
- **Waiting**, a matching runner exists but hasn't claimed the job →
*"Waiting for a matching runner to become available."*
The runner lookup reuses the same available-online-runner query the run
list already performs, and only runs while a selected job is actually
pending. Dependency resolution is scoped to the same parent job and
treats matrix expansions of a `need` as pending until all of them
complete.
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Backport #38477 by @bircni
The artifact info hover tooltip (#37100) only worked for live artifacts.
Hovering an expired/deleted artifact showed nothing, and even on live
artifacts the retention date was missing on real runs.
Two root causes:
1. **Expired artifacts had no tooltip.** In the run view sidebar,
expired artifacts render in a separate branch that omitted
`data-tooltip-content` entirely, so there was nothing to hover.
2. **`ExpiresUnix` was no longer sent.** The `ActionRunAttempt` refactor
(#37119) dropped `ExpiresUnix` from `fillViewRunResponseArtifacts`, so
real runs always returned `0` and the tooltip fell back to size-only.
Only the devtest mock still populated it, which masked the regression.
Artifacts without a recorded expiry (`expiresUnix <= 0`) still degrade
gracefully to a size-only tooltip. Both states can be previewed on the
`/devtest/mock/*` actions run page.
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #38406 by @bircni
Addresses a batch of privately reported security issues, grouped by
area:
- **SSRF** - migration PR-patch/asset fetches, OAuth2 avatar & OpenID
discovery, pull-mirror URL re-validation, and the outbound proxy path.
- **Access-token scope** - prevent scope escalation on token creation;
keep public-only tokens confined (feeds, packages, Actions listings,
star/watch lists, limited/private owners).
- **Access control / disclosure** - go-get default-branch leak, webhook
authorization-header leak, watch clearing on private transitions,
label/attachment scoping.
- **Denial of service** - input bounds for npm dist-tags, Debian control
files, Arch file lists, and SSH keys.
### 📌 Attention for site admins
Not breaking - existing configs keep working - but two changes are worth
a look:
- **New SSRF protection** Outbound requests (migrations, OAuth2 avatars,
OpenID discovery, pull mirrors, proxy path) are now validated against
the allow/block host lists. If your instance legitimately reaches
internal hosts, you may need to add them to
`[security].ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` (and the relevant `ALLOW_LOCALNETWORKS`
settings).
- **Deprecation** `[webhook].ALLOWED_HOST_LIST` is deprecated and will
be removed in a future release. Use `[security].ALLOWED_HOST_LIST`
instead; the old key still works for now.
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: TheFox0x7 <thefox0x7@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Backport #38410
Before: the merge box is only refreshed when the PR is being
conflict-checked.
After: also refresh the merge box when the commit status is pending
(e.g.: Action task is running)
By the way, slightly increase the refresh interval to 5s
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #38386 by @bircni
The commit page built its "co-authored by" list from
`AllParticipantIdentities()[1:]`, which only drops the author and leaves
the committer in the list even though the committer is already shown
separately as "committed by". This caused the committer to be wrongly
rendered as a co-author (issue #38384): a commit authored by
`silverwind`, committed by `bircni`, with a `Co-authored-by: silverwind`
trailer displayed "co-authored by bircni" instead of the actual trailer
identity. This adds a `Commit.CoAuthorIdentities()` method that excludes
both the author and the committer, uses it on the commit page, and
covers the fix with a regression test.
Closes#38384
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Backport #38314 by @lunny
This fixes the web release edit flow so renamed release attachments are
validated against `[repository.release] ALLOWED_TYPES`.
Previously, the API attachment edit endpoint already enforced release
attachment type restrictions, but the web release edit form passed
`attachment-edit-*` values into `release_service.UpdateRelease`, which
updated attachment names directly without validating the new filename
against `setting.Repository.Release.AllowedTypes`.
As a result, a user with repository write access could rename an
existing release attachment to a disallowed extension through the web
UI.
- validate edited release attachment names in
`release_service.UpdateRelease`
- reject forbidden attachment renames using
`setting.Repository.Release.AllowedTypes`
- re-render the web release edit page with a validation error instead of
returning an internal server error
- add regression coverage for both the service layer and the web flow
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Backport #38318 by @bircni
Draft-release access control was enforced only on the API release
endpoints (`/api/v1/repos/{owner}/{repo}/releases/...`) but not on the
UUID-based web attachment endpoints (`/attachments/{uuid}`,
`/{owner}/{repo}/attachments/{uuid}`,
`/{owner}/{repo}/releases/attachments/{uuid}`).
Anyone who obtained an attachment UUID — including unauthenticated
callers — could download files belonging to a hidden draft release,
since `ServeAttachment` only checked repo-level read permission and
never the release's draft state.
This extends `ServeAttachment` to require write access to releases when
the attachment belongs to a draft release, mirroring the existing
API-side `canAccessReleaseDraft` gate. A regression test is included.
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
## Summary
This PR adds **scoped workflows** to Gitea Actions. Workflows defined
centrally in a "source" repository that automatically run on every
repository in scope: an organization's repositories, or (for instance
admins) every repository on the instance. Each scoped run executes in
the consuming repository's own context (its runners, secrets, and
branch) while its content is read from the source repository, so an org
or instance can mandate shared CI across many repositories without
copying workflow files into each one.
An owner or instance admin registers source repositories on a settings
page and can mark individual workflows as **required**. A required
scoped workflow cannot be opted out by a consuming repository and gates
its pull-request merges; an optional one can be disabled per repository.
Scoped workflows live under a dedicated `SCOPED_WORKFLOW_DIRS` (default
`.gitea/scoped_workflows`), kept separate from regular `WORKFLOW_DIRS`.
## Main changes
### Configuration
New `SCOPED_WORKFLOW_DIRS` setting, validated to not overlap with
`WORKFLOW_DIRS`. Default: `.gitea/scoped_workflows`
### Data model & migration
- New `action_scoped_workflow_source` table mapping a registering owner
(`owner_id`, where `0` = instance-level) to a source repository, with a
per-workflow `WorkflowConfigs` map.
- `ActionRun` gains `WorkflowRepoID` / `WorkflowCommitSHA` (the pinned
content source) and an `IsScopedRun` flag.
### Detection & run creation
On consumer events, scoped workflows from the effective sources (the
owner's own sources plus instance-level ones) are matched and turned
into runs that execute in the consumer's context, with content pinned to
the source repo's default-branch commit.
`on: workflow_run` and `on: schedule` are currently not supported.
### Opt-out
A consuming repository can disable an optional scoped workflow (tracked
separately from regular `DisabledWorkflows`); required scoped workflows
can never be disabled, opted out, or bypassed.
### Commit status
A scoped run's status context format is `"<source repo full name>:
<workflow display name> / <job> (<event>)"`
(for example: `my-org/scoped-workflows: db-tests / test-sqlite
(pull_request)`),
keeping it distinct from a same-named repo-level workflow and from other
sources.
### Required status checks
Admins mark workflows required and supply status-check patterns.
`EffectiveRequiredContexts` appends those patterns to the branch
protection's required contexts and they are matched
must-present-and-pass. If the status checks from scoped workflows fail,
the PR cannot be merged.
NOTE: scoped workflows' required status checks patterns can protect any
target branch that has a protection rule, even though the rule's "Status
Check" is disabled. A target branch with no protection rule cannot be
protected.
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
<img width="1400" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a5d1db33-15ec-487e-93be-2bc04b4e6643"
/>
</details>
### Reusable workflows (`uses:`)
A scoped workflow's local `uses: ./...` resolves against the source
repository. `uses:` directory validation honors the
instance-configurable `WORKFLOW_DIRS` and `SCOPED_WORKFLOW_DIRS`
(previously hardcoded to `.gitea`/`.github/workflows`).
### Manual dispatch
`workflow_dispatch` is supported for scoped workflows (web and API),
resolving inputs/content from the source repo.
### Performance
A process-local LRU cache keyed by source repo ID for the per-source
workflow parse, so instance-level and owner-level sources don't open the
source repo and parse workflow files on every event.
### UI
Org / user / admin pages to register and remove sources, search
repositories, and mark workflows required with their status-check
patterns. The repository Actions sidebar groups scoped workflows by
source with owner/instance labels and required/disabled badges.
<details>
<summary>Screenshots</summary>
Scoped workflows setting page:
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/9d19f667-97a5-4935-92b2-e53f105e3642"
/>
Consumer repo's Actions runs list:
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a77241f9-0aa9-41aa-ba73-12a9a688cb64"
/>
- `Owner`: this is a owner-level scoped workflows source repo
- `Global`: this is a global scoped workflows source repo
- `Required`: this scoped workflow is required, repo admin cannot
disable it
</details>
---
Docs: https://gitea.com/gitea/docs/pulls/447
---------
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Compare API requests with a `^` or `~N` revision suffix (for example
`compare/main...feature^`) were rejected with `400 Unsupported
comparison syntax: ref with suffix`. The fix resolves the suffix to a
commit before comparing, so `base...head^` and `~N` work on either side,
the same as git.
Only `^`/`~N` navigation is resolved. Pull request creation still
requires plain branch refs, and the web compare page keeps rejecting
suffixes since its branch selectors need separate UI work.
Closes#33943
- Display the per-repository run number as `#N` next to the run title in
the run view, matching the runs list and GitHub
- Add the run `Index` to the run view API response (and the devtest
mock) to support that
- Restore the summary panel's `flex: 1` so the workflow graph fills the
right-column height even when a run has no job summaries
- Keep the job-summary section content-sized so it doesn't compete with
the graph for height
- Gate the devtest mock job summaries to a subset of runs so the devtest
page also exercises the no-summary layout
<img width="521" height="232" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/a1f2f20b-65bd-4d98-ba6a-b8135580a6de"
/>
Fixes five N+1 / O(n) query patterns found across common user paths.
Each uses a bulk query that already existed elsewhere in the codebase.
| Location | Problem | Introduced in |
| -------------------------------- |
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
| ------------- |
| `IssueList.LoadIsRead` | `.In("issue_id")` missing its arg — xorm
generates `WHERE 0=1`, so `IsRead` is **never** set; every issue always
appears unread | #29515 |
| `ParseCommitsWithStatus` | `GetLatestCommitStatus` called once per
commit (O(n) queries on commit list / PR commits tab) | #33605 |
| `getReleaseInfos` (release list) | `GetLatestCommitStatus` called once
per release for CI badges | #29149 |
| User milestone dashboard | O(n×m) nested loop matching milestones to
repos | #26300 |
| `findCodeComments` (PR diff) | `LoadResolveDoer` + `LoadReactions`
called per inline comment — up to ~150 queries on a PR with 50 comments
| #20821 |
---------
Co-authored-by: Lauris B <lauris@nix.lv>
This PR fixes a bug in the UI that prevented non-collaborator users (the
issue poster or creator) from setting the target branch (ref) of an
issue. The backend API already supports this, but the UI was rigidly
disabling the dropdown based only on collaborator status.
Changes:
- Enable the branch selector for the issue poster and during new issue
creation.
- Fix a typo (.IsIssueWriter -> .IsIssuePoster) that was preventing the
reference update URL from being correctly set for posters.
- Enforce org visibility on organization label read endpoints (private
org labels no longer leak to non-members).
- Block fork sync (`merge-upstream`) when the base repo is no longer
readable (stops pulling commits after a parent goes private).
- Remove `REVERSE_PROXY_LIMIT` / `REVERSE_PROXY_TRUSTED_PROXIES` from
the Docker `app.ini` templates (the `= *` default allowed
`X-WEBAUTH-USER` impersonation; reverse-proxy auth is now opt-in and
admin-configured).
- Enforce single-use TOTP passcodes across web login, password-reset,
and Basic-Auth `X-Gitea-OTP` (fixes a TOCTOU race and a stateless
replay).
- Re-check branch write permission for every ref in a push (the
pre-receive hook cached the first ref's result, letting a per-branch
maintainer-edit grant escalate to full repo write).
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
## Summary
Adds `GET
/repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/{basehead}.{diffType:diff|patch}`,
mirroring the existing `/git/commits/{sha}.{diffType}` endpoint but for
comparisons between two arbitrary refs.
The new endpoint streams a raw unified diff or `git format-patch` output
between any two refs:
GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/main...feature.diff
GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/v1.0..v1.1.patch
GET /repos/{owner}/{repo}/compare/abc1234...def5678.diff
Resolves#5561, #13416 and #17165.
AI was used while creating this PR. Automated tests were added as per
the contribution policy.
---------
Co-authored-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
* fix incorrect delayWriter call (there is already a defer call)
* split HookPostReceive into small functions
* fix incorrect HookPostReceiveResult response for errors
* fix incorrect AddRepoToLicenseUpdaterQueue call
* make sure repo home and branches page can work without default branch
* make sure default branch is always synchronized between database and
git repo, and fix FIXME
Follow-up to #37987, addressing the unresolved review comments on the
org members search form.
And fix more trivial problems together (see the commit titles)
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
- Add GitHub-style Actions **job summaries** support
(`GITHUB_STEP_SUMMARY` / `workflow/SUMMARY.md`) and render them on the
run Summary view.
- Store uploaded summaries internally in the DB (not as downloadable
artifacts).
- Add runtime-token endpoint for runners to upload summaries:
- `PUT
/api/actions_pipeline/_apis/pipelines/workflows/{run_id}/jobs/{job_id}/summary`
- Advertise support to runners via `RunnerService.Declare` response
header:
- `X-Gitea-Actions-Capabilities: job-summary`
- Devtest: extend `/devtest/repo-action-view/...` to include mock
`jobSummaries` for previewing UI rendering.
## Compatibility
- New Gitea + old runner: no summary upload → UI shows nothing (no
behavior change)
- New runner + old Gitea: capability not advertised → runner skips
upload (no behavior change)
## Screenshot:
<img width="2017" height="729"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/31f8b945-50c4-40e1-9f40-382901a53013"
/>
Fixes#23721
PR on gitea-runner https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/917
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- Redesign the Actions run summary header to follow GitHub Actions
layout: trigger info on the left, Status / Total duration / Artifacts
columns inline on the right
- Expose trigger user avatar, pull request link, and PR head branch info
from the run view API
- Update the workflow graph header to show the workflow filename (linked
to the run workflow file) and `on: <event>`, while keeping the
jobs/dependencies/success stats line
- Remove the redundant commit/workflow metadata row below the run title;
that information now lives in the summary bar
New:
<img width="1564" height="639"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/e6bc1623-c5fc-4e97-abc9-fde7f3c6aef9"
/>
Old:
<img width="2038" height="1038"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0857f19a-8d3a-4da2-82fd-e9ebeb200062"
/>
Replaces https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/36721
---------
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Parse `Co-authored-by:` trailers from commit messages and surface
contributors as an avatar stack across the commit page, commits list, PR
commits tab, latest-commit row, blame, graph, and dashboard feed.
- Up to 10 visible 20px avatars, GitHub-style overlap (6px first stride,
4px between subsequent), `+N` chip for the rest.
- Label: 1 → name; 2 → `<a> and <b>`; 3+ → `<N> people` opens a Tippy
popup with all participants.
- Names and avatars link to the repo's commits-by-author search; fall
back to profile or `mailto:`.
- Trailer parsing uses `net/mail.ParseAddress`, scans only the trailing
paragraph, filters out the commit's own author/committer.
- Drops the non-standard `Co-committed-by:` emission on squash merge and
web edits.
Devtest: `/devtest/coauthor-avatars`.
Fixes#25521
----
<img width="353" height="277" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/72092ceb-97ca-4b09-9557-0b72d3c5458e"
/>
<img width="533" height="328"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/11d0c8f8-8b3f-4f2e-9993-879f1c06bcc5"
/>
---------
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
## Summary
This PR improves reusable workflow support for Gitea Actions. The
parsing of the called workflow now happens on Gitea side, not on the
runner. When the caller becomes ready, Gitea fetches the called workflow
source, parses it, and inserts each child job into the database as a
`ActionRunJob` linked to the caller via `ParentCallJobID`. As a result,
every callee job is dispatched as its own task and its logs surface as
an independent job entry in the UI, rather than being inlined into the
caller's "Set up job" step.
This PR supports two kinds of `uses` :
- same-repo call: `uses: ./.gitea/workflows/foo.yaml`
- cross-repo call: `uses: OWNER/REPO/.gitea/workflows/foo.yaml@REF`
## **⚠️ BREAKING ⚠️**
External reusable workflows (`uses:
https://other-gitea-instance/OWNER/REPO/.gitea/workflows/test.yaml@REF`)
are no longer supported. To keep using them, clone the repositories to
the local instance.
## Main changes
### Execution model
- Each caller job carries `IsReusableCaller=true` and won't be fetched
by runners.
- `ParentCallJobID` can link a called job to its caller.
- Caller status is derived from its direct children.
### Workflow syntax
- `jobparser` now supports parsing `on: workflow_call` trigger with
`inputs:`, `outputs:`, and `secrets:` declarations.
- **Max nesting depth**: capped at `MaxReusableCallLevels = 9`, which
means a top-level caller may have at most 9 nested callers below it.
- **Cycle prevention**: at expansion time, `checkCallerChain` walks the
caller's ancestor chain via `ParentCallJobID` and rejects if the same
`uses:` string appears anywhere upstream (`reusable workflow call cycle
detected`). This catches both direct (`A -> A`) and indirect (`A -> B ->
A`) cycles.
### Cross-repo access
- To share reusable workflows from private repos, use `Collaborative
Owners` introduced by #32562
### Rerun semantics
- `expandRerunJobIDs` partitions the latest attempt's jobs into:
- a **rerun set**: jobs being rerun + downstream siblings within the
same scope.
- an **ancestor set**: reusable callers whose only *some* descendants
are being rerun (the caller itself is not).
- Cloning behavior for callers in `execRerunPlan`:
- **Caller is fully rerun** (caller's `AttemptJobID` in `rerunSet`):
none of its descendants are cloned. The caller is cloned with
`IsCallerExpanded=false`, and re-expansion (which reinserts the children
fresh) happens later when the resolver brings the caller to `Waiting`
again.
- **Caller is in ancestor set** (only some descendants rerun): the
caller is pass-through (`Status` will be updated by its fresh children).
Its non-rerun descendants are also pass-through clones (point
`SourceTaskID` at the original task). Their `ParentCallJobID` is
remapped to the new attempt's caller row.
### UI
- Job list in `RepoActionView.vue` is now tree-shaped: callers indent
their children. Callers default to collapsed.
- New caller detail page using `WorkflowGraph` to show direct children
only; the run summary's `WorkflowGraph` shows top-level callers and
their immediate descendants.
### Known trade-offs
- **Caller expansion runs inside the enclosing write transaction.**
`expandReusableWorkflowCaller` performs a git read of the called
workflow while holding the row locks that update the caller and insert
its children. This is intentional: the caller-row update and child-row
inserts must commit atomically. None of the call sites is hot (each
caller is expanded once per attempt), so the trade-off is acceptable.
- **A malformed `if:` expression on a job leaves it `Blocked`
silently.** `evaluateJobIf` now runs server-side as part of resolver
passes; deterministic expression errors (typos, undefined context
fields) are logged but do not surface in the UI. This is the same
behavior the resolver already had for concurrency-expression errors.
Distinguishing transient DB errors from user-authored expression errors
and writing the latter back as `StatusFailure` is a follow-up.
#### Screenshots
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/bfaa9b7a-07e9-4127-8de9-a81f86e82828"
/>
<img width="1600" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/8af109b3-ef28-4b53-aaad-d4632b923224"
/>
## References
-
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/how-tos/reuse-automations/reuse-workflows
-
https://docs.github.com/en/actions/reference/workflows-and-actions/reusing-workflow-configurations
---
Replace #36388
---------
Signed-off-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Copilot Autofix powered by AI <175728472+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Summary
- Add a Branch filter dropdown to the repo Actions run list web UI
- Wire `?branch=` query param through the web handler, matching the
existing REST API filter behavior
- Source the Branch dropdown from the indexed `branch` table (filtering
out deleted branches) instead of scanning `action_run.ref`, addressing
review feedback about unindexed columns
The Event filter was dropped after review: a static list of supported
events was noisy as UX, and querying distinct values from
`action_run.trigger_event` is slow because the column is not indexed.
`FindRunOptions.TriggerEvent` is kept for the REST API.
Closes#25042
---------
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
## Fixes#36983
## Summary
1. Add transitional `Cancelling` status (between `Running` and
`Cancelled`); cancel flow marks active tasks `Cancelling`, runner
finalizes to `Cancelled` on terminal result.
2. Taskless jobs cancel directly (no runner to finalize).
3. Runner-protocol responses map `Cancelling` → `RESULT_CANCELLED`.
4. Run/job aggregation treats `Cancelling` as active.
5. Status mapping/aggregation tests + en-US locale added.
**Problem**
When a workflow was cancelled from the UI, jobs were marked cancelled
immediately, which could skip post-run cleanup behavior.
## Solution
Use a transitional status path:
Running → Cancelling → Cancelled
This allows runner finalization and cleanup path execution before final
terminal state.
**Testing**
> 1. go test -tags "sqlite sqlite_unlock_notify" ./models/actions -run
"TestAggregateJobStatus|TestStatusAsResult|TestStatusFromResult"
> 2. go run
github.com/golangci/golangci-lint/v2/cmd/golangci-lint@v2.11.4 run
./models/actions/... ./routers/api/actions/runner/...
## Related
- act_runner: https://gitea.com/gitea/act_runner/pulls/825 —
independent; this PR's capability gate keeps legacy runners on the
immediate-cancel path. The new flow activates only for runners that
advertise the `cancelling` capability.
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Zettat123 <zettat123@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
This PR tightens token-scope enforcement for non-API download endpoints
in the web layer.
What it changes:
- require `read:repository` for repository content downloads served from
web routes such as:
- `/raw/...`
- `/media/...`
- enforce attachment-specific scopes in `ServeAttachment`:
- issue / pull request attachments require `read:issue`
- release attachments require `read:repository`
- centralize token-scope checks for web handlers with a shared context
helper
- add matrix-style integration coverage for:
- public and private repository content downloads
- `blob`, `branch`, `tag`, and `commit` download routes
- global and repo-scoped attachment routes
- `public-only` token behavior on public vs private resources
Why:
API tokens and OAuth access tokens can be used on some non-API web
endpoints. Before this change, those endpoints relied on repository
visibility and unit permissions, but did not consistently enforce the
token’s declared scope. That allowed scoped tokens to access resources
beyond their intended category through web download routes.
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
- Introduce a “Bypass Protection Allowlist” on branch rules
(users/teams) alongside admins, with BlockAdminMergeOverride
still respected.
- Surface the allowlist in API (create/edit options, structs) and
settings UI; merge box now shows the red button +
message for bypass-capable users.
- Apply bypass logic to merge checks and pre-receive so allowlisted
users can override unmet approvals/status checks/
protected files when force-merging.
- Add migration for new columns, locale strings, and unit tests (bypass
helper; queue test tweak).
<img width="1069" height="218" alt="image"
src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/0b61bc2a-a27f-47f3-a923-613688008e65"
/>
Fixes#36476
---------
Co-authored-by: silverwind <me@silverwind.io>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Codex GPT-5.3 <codex@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: GPT-5.2 <noreply@openai.com>
Co-authored-by: Cursor <cursoragent@cursor.com>
Co-authored-by: Claude (Opus 4.7) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This PR fixes two permission-checking gaps in Git and LFS request
handling.
## What it changes
- keep wiki Git HTTP pushes on the normal write-permission path, even
when proc-receive support is enabled
- revalidate LFS bearer token requests against the current user state
and current repository permissions before allowing access
- add regression coverage for unauthorized wiki HTTP pushes
- add LFS tests for blocked users, revoked repository access, read-only
upload attempts, and valid write access
## Why
- wiki repositories should not inherit the relaxed refs/for handling
used for normal code repositories
- LFS authorization tokens should not remain usable after a user is
disabled or loses repository access
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Eyüp Can Akman