Backport #38893 by @HsukqiLee
Closes#38872
Labels in the label selection dropdown (issue/PR sidebar, new issue
form) were always listed alphabetically, so a scoped set like the
default Priority labels showed up as Critical, High, Low, Medium even
though each label carries an exclusive order.
This adds `CompareLabelForDisplay`/`SortLabelsForDisplay` in
`models/issues`: labels are grouped by their exclusive scope and sorted
by exclusive order within a scope (unordered ones last), falling back to
name order. The sorting is applied to the issue page sidebar data and
the shared label filter data, so the filter dropdown on the issue list
gets the same ordering.
Unscoped labels are unaffected and still sort by name. Includes a unit
test covering the default Priority label set.
Co-authored-by: Hsukqi Lee <team@tsinbei.com>
The `Repository` struct in `services/context/repo.go` embedded
`access_model.Permission` anonymously, causing all permission methods to
be promoted directly onto `Repository`. This made it unclear at call
sites whether a method belonged to `Repository` itself or to its
embedded `Permission`.
### Changes
- **`services/context/repo.go`**: Replace anonymous
`access_model.Permission` with named field `Permission
access_model.Permission`
- **49 files** updated to route permission method calls through the
named field:
```go
// Before
ctx.Repo.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.CanWrite)
// After
ctx.Repo.Permission.IsAdmin()
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite(unit.TypeCode)
ctx.Repo.Permission.CanReadIssuesOrPulls(isPull)
slices.ContainsFunc(unitTypes, ctx.Repo.Permission.CanWrite)
```
Methods defined directly on `*Repository` (`CanWriteToBranch`,
`CanCreateBranch`, etc.) are unchanged.
---------
Co-authored-by: copilot-swe-agent[bot] <198982749+Copilot@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <2114189+wxiaoguang@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Nicolas <bircni@icloud.com>
Fix various legacy problems, including:
* Don't create default column when viewing an empty project
* Fix layouts for Windows
* Fix (partially) #15509
* Fix (partially) #17705
The sidebar refactoring: it is a clear partial-reloading approach,
brings better user experiences, and it makes "Multiple projects" /
"Project column on issue sidebar" feature easy to be added.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR fixes a performance problem when reviewing a pull request in a
big instance which have many records in the `review` table.
Traditionally, we should add more indexes in that table. But since
dismissed reviews of 1 pull request will not be too many as expected in
a common repository. Filtering reviews in the memory should be more
quick .
---------
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
This PR rewrites `GetReviewer` function and move it to service layer.
Reviewers should not be watchers, so that this PR removed all watchers
from reviewers. When the repository is under an organization, the pull
request unit read permission will be checked to resolve the bug of
#32394Fix#32394
Giteabot