Backport of https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/pull/38754
Every `${{ }}` part was spliced as raw text into a synthesized
`format('...', <raw>)` call and re-parsed, so unbalanced parentheses
restructured the whole expression:
```yaml
run-name: ${{ 1) && (2 }} # panicked, aborting workflow parsing for the push
if: ${{ 1 }} ${{ 0) && (0 }} # silently skipped the job
runs-on: ${{ nosuchcontext.x }} # silently queued the job against the label ""
```
One scanner shaped like GitHub's template reader now splits every value
and each part is evaluated on its own, so nothing builds an expression
out of text. A part that fails is an error instead of an empty string.
`expressionCallsFunction` is self-contained here, since this branch has
no `expressionsMatch` to build it on. That makes
`github.com/rhysd/actionlint` a direct dependency, which it already is
on `main`.
Support `continue-on-error` for workflow jobs when aggregating an
Actions workflow run status.
Previously, `continue-on-error` was parsed from workflow YAML but was
not persisted or used when calculating the overall run result. As a
result, a failed job could incorrectly fail the entire workflow even
when the workflow explicitly allowed that job to fail.
This PR stores the parsed `continue-on-error` value on each action run
job and treats failed jobs with `continue-on-error: true` as successful
when computing the workflow run status, matching GitHub Actions
behavior.
## Changes
- Add `ContinueOnError` to `jobparser.Job`.
- Add `continue_on_error` to `ActionRunJob` with a `NOT NULL DEFAULT
FALSE` migration.
- Populate `ActionRunJob.ContinueOnError` when creating workflow run
jobs.
- Update workflow status aggregation so failed `continue-on-error` jobs
do not fail the overall run.
- Leave `resolveCheckNeeds` unchanged so dependent jobs still see the
job result as `failure` and are skipped by default.
## Compatibility
This is backward compatible.
If only the runner or only the server is updated, `continue-on-error`
continues to degrade to the previous behavior and is effectively ignored
until both sides support it.
Related runner PR: https://gitea.com/gitea/runner/pulls/1032
---------
Signed-off-by: bircni <bircni@icloud.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
## The issue
Closes#37568. Basically due to empty fields being present in the
actions file, the jobs would be produced as `nil` inside `jobparser.go`
. Because of this when we call `Parse` on the `jobparser` module.
```go
Needs: job.Needs(),
```
would propagate the `nil` job down the chain.
## The fix
For now i decide to fix it by guarding with an `if job == nil` check.
---------
Signed-off-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Lunny Xiao <xiaolunwen@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Giteabot <teabot@gitea.io>
The jobparser sub package in act is only used by Gitea. Move it to Gitea
to make it more easier to maintain.
---------
Co-authored-by: Christopher Homberger <christopher.homberger@web.de>
silverwind